The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
To build a water clock you will need two plastic bottles, tape and an L shaped stand.
First tape one of the bottles to the stand with adhesive tape. Then make a hole to replace a straw on at the neck of the bottle. Cut the neck off of the other bottle, place that bottle at the bottom of the stand. Make a little hole at the bottom of the top bottle. Now you got the structure.
To start building, put a tap on the top bottle and turn it on. Then cover the hole with your finger. Aftermath, let the top bottle fill so that it can overflow through the straw and make water level constant. Later move your finger away from the hole and let it fill the bottom bottle. Along put a mark on the bottom bottle per minute to show water level until it fills. After that empty the bottom bottle and repeat the whole progress for timing.
Overall, even though it is an easy thing to create your water clock, you need to have patience, whereas it is a long process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 76
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.1935483871 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.91400869857 2.65546596893 72% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6159621095 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.0 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.3076923077 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.84615384615 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118674289329 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420730819901 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414842434715 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738172063792 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108696060865 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.5 13.2329268293 42% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.43 11.4140731707 56% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.28 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.