The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
The given table provides information about the number of Australians coming from various types of households lived in poverty in the year of 1999. Overall, it is clear that nuclear family makes up the largest proportion, while old-couple family turns out to have the most sufficient life.
In 1999, more than 900,000 people in the family comprising of couple and children had poor living condition. While the proportion of couple with children family is only 12%, single type and single parent type reach the highest at around 20%, but the result of adults unmarried and not having children peaked at 359,000 which was over 120,000 people more than the other type.
The percentages and the real statistic numbers of aged people hit the bottom with the merely same figures at approximately 5 percent and 50,000 people respectively. Moreover, 7 percent as well as over 200,000 couples not having children lived under average living standard in 1999. Those numbers contribute to a total of about a tenth of households in all types which is nearly 2 million Australians who lived in poverty back to the year of 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-12-01 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
... more than 900,000 people in the family comprising of couple and children had poor living con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97326203209 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54200323251 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604278074866 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1328942637 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18443786279 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973507401263 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567673251641 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13437003918 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370287681691 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.