The pie charts compare the expenditure of a school in the UK in three
different years over a 20-year period.
The given pie charts compare the proportion of expenditures in five different sectors with respect to a school in the UK over a period of 3 decades from 1981 to 2001.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over a period as a whole, the major proportion of investment went for teachers' salaries. However, investment in the insurance sector witnessed a slight upward trend over time.
According to the given illustration, during the first decade, teachers' salaries rose to 50% from 40% in 1991. Also, whilst resources accounted for a fifth of the total(up by 5%), with merely a 1% increase, insurance made up 3% of the overall expenditure. However, other workers' salaries and furniture equipment observed a sharp plunge of nearly 6% and 10% respectively by the period end.
Turning to 2001, despite a 5% decline, teachers' salaries constituted a major part of the total expenditure. Besides, whereas other workers' salaries continued to decline(22% down to 15%), by contrast, resources, and furniture's budget kept fluctuating, reaching 9% and 23% respectively.
- Essay showing the process by which carbonated drinks are made also called a diagram essay 84
- 82
- The chart below shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles traveled PMT by transportation type in 2002 73
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 The bar chart shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- The line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, look, so, whereas, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26436781609 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03746370475 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0462992479 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154603698419 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645802910248 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117139316775 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116257960822 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147833933849 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.