In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Here is a band 9 IELTS essay on this topic. Need help with writing?
Since development in farming over the past few decades, has brought us several advantages. Although these improvements alongside the other advancements are expected to decline the hungry, still there are too much people who cannot have access to those sources. This thorny issue will be unveiled in the following paragraphs as well as the probable solutions.
Technological advancements resulted in more modernized farming which leads to cultivating a huge amount of products with the least water as the main source in agriculture. Since development of new technology, it is more likely to farm with the least proportions of water which could be crucial in this issue. As a prime example, there is some equipment which prompted the water needed for plant continuously and also with the least consumption or waste. Besides the reduction of water consumption by applying new practices, some products are genetically manipulated to reduce their requirements for water and also contain more mineral and other vital nutrients. In other word, human beings achieved a great prosperity in well-produced agricultural products.
On the contrary to these achievements, it remains a number of people who have not accessibility or affordability to agriculture products. Firstly, naturally, water is vital source for farming and it would be unimaginable farming without water in the present day. However, there are not sufficient researches and investments in farming in the regions with the permanent drought. The second noteworthy issue is that contribution of countries which are ambushed with water to the poorer regions should not be neglected. It could be like a mutual fairly trade where both sides can be benefitted and satisfied.
Based on the arguments outlined above, I should reaffirm my position which developed countries should be well-informed in this acute issue and make effort and devote their facilities to untangle those hurdles until there would be a world without a person standing for food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | milad_salehi2002 | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Living In A Country Where You Have To Speak A Foreign Language Can Cause Serious Social And Practical Problems 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...decline the hungry, still there are too much people who cannot have access to those ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, second, so, still, well, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40575079872 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02796190826 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2785191435 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146066290345 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523855519003 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345887171214 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916003209195 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00687092777432 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.