The line graph below shows the number of visitors to Tabard Towers Theme Park each month last year.
The line graph demonstrates changes in the number of monthly visitors to a theme park called Tabard Towers last year.
Overall, the number of travelers to Tabard Towers Theme Park last year experienced a gradual growth during the first four months but fell steadily at the end of the period. However, the time between May and September recorded the most volatile figures of all months given.
Starting at 30,000 visitors in January, the number of tourists rose in equal steps in the next three months, followed by a continual improvement at a faster pace, reaching the level of 70,000 people in May. The figures then fluctuated wildly, first declining to hit the lowest point of 20,000 attendances in June, subsequently rocketing by almost 500% next month before falling back again in August. September saw a sharp turnaround in attendances with numbers leaping from just under 80,000 to 140,000 people.
In the last three months of the year, the number of people who paid a visit to Tabard Towers Theme Park was off their September peak, plunging back by 20,000 tourists each month till the end of the year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | huongthan223 | 82 | view |
- The line graph below shows the number of visitors to Tabard Towers Theme Park each month last year 82
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 98
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'months'' or 'month's'?
Suggestion: months'; month's
...corded the most volatile figures of all months given. Starting at 30,000 visitors in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92553191489 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44451789172 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3260067066 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406483175333 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21093934923 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.221942863745 0.0843802449381 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334354869261 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.212475025814 0.0819641961636 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.