The line graph shows the number of newly graduated students in the UK, while the bar chart compares their proportions in five different jobs occupied by them in 1992, 1997, and 2002.
The given line chart illustrates the number of students who earned their graduation degree, while the bar graph provides a proportional comparison in the context of job type opted by them over a period of 10 years from 1992 to 2002 in the United Kingdom.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of the degree-holders were witnessed in the mid-half of the given period, followed by a sharp decline. Also, over time, despite a substantial plunge, the professional sector remained popular among the job-seekers.
To begin with, the number of graduates rose dramatically from 1650000 to a peak of 1950000 in 1997. However, this trend plummeted drastically, reaching a figure lower by nearly 150000 in 2007.
Turning to the bar graph, in 1992, nearly 3 in every 5 graduates selected the professional field, which was up by 40% as compared to the remaining sectors. However, after a decade, whilst the proportion of the professionals slacked off, at about a 2:5 ratio, clerical and secretarial's percentage climbed up by a 20% increment. Furthermore, whereas sales and other sectors reached on par with each other(10% each), by contrast, the management and administrative role slipped slightly by 2%(20% down to 18%).
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 89
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 74
- The bar graph on average weekly household expenditure by region 2007 09 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 91
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onals slacked off, at about a 2:5 ratio, clerical and secretarials percentage cli...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ipped slightly by 2%20% down to 18%.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, so, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22660098522 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04212619348 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689655172414 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.326279169 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246528981177 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859574762229 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11996279476 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138851494787 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136969254047 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.