some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university, to work or to travel. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advanatges?
Post high school gap year has gained traction in recents years. Upper secondary school graduates have a reference to spending a year cultivating practical skills or exploring the outer world. Apart from some benefits this may bring, I believe the disadvantages are way more worrisome.
Gap year is the duration when students make a final decision about their high education plan. They provide themselves time to identify the suitable career to peruse. At the mean time, honing practical skills will potentially underpin their occupation in the future. In short, experience is the significant advantage of gap year.
Delaying tertiary education for one year would lead to many worth-considering drawbacks. Enroll in university after 1 year would make gap year takers fall behind others. During school years, students had ba=etter receive an appropriate occupational guidances so that they can embark on college right after high school. Knowledge and skills gained from formal schooling will offer a great support for college curriculum but social skills. Intermission to labour or travel is likely to decrease students logical thinking and related academic capabilities. Furthermore, long-term break in inclined to discourage pupils from resuming the studying path.
Time-consuming is the following ground of my viewpoint. Manual work and part-time jobs are the only possible chance for undergraduates without any diploma. As a result, I strongly argue that people should attend university instantly and accomplish it as soon as possible. By that way, bachelor degree can guarantee a more profitable jobs with more significant salary offered.
One-year procrastination bring about many disadvantages in comparisons with the benefits. High school seniors ought to continue with college in lieu of wasting a year
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | phuonganh.ngx | 84 | view |
- The given pie charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or pursuing further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison
- online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- in spite if the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is the case What can be dine about this 56
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnescessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, second, so, apart from, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59636363636 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00030632045 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676363636364 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1868240357 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4736842105 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26562978879 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071963374507 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619905056967 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136926332789 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550858742285 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.