teachers should not make their social or political views known in the classrooms. Do you agree or disagree?
People from different levels of society have different social or political attitudes. Teachers are one of the most effective social members who affect all people at least for a specific time like at school. However, some individuals are of the opinion that teachers should be clear about their social or political views, some others hold on the opposite opinion. Personally, It is my confirmed standpoint that teachers should stay neutral regarding political or social views. I will pinpoint my point of view through the two most rational reasons noted in the following passages.
The first remarkable reason to be mention is that teachers have a strong impactful effect on students that may cause misleading students to choose their social attitudes. To be more specific, it is crystal clear that students' thoughts are influenced by teacher's and their role in students' preferences is undeniable. Consequently, they prevent students from social or political free development. For example, if instructors talk about their social or political preferences, students tend to the same preference as their professors since, in the mind of the students especially in elementary school, teachers' words are truly right. Therefore, students will not have the chance to pick up their own preferences regarding social or political issues.
The second significant point to be stated is that teachers should encourage students to concentrate on scientific subjects which they are going to graduate in. In other words, social or political issues in the class are potentially distractive that not only bring up useless arguments among students but also cause students to lose their focus on their lessons. Actually class members believe in different ideas, religions, and so on. Moreover, knowing about professors' political views prevents students from expressing their opinions freely, being afraid of judging by them. My own experience of the sociology class in middle school clarifies this. My teacher always emphasized his religion as a Muslim which always made me hesitate to ask about the wars between Muslims who have the same God, Prophit, and Quran. Had he never mentioned his religion, I could have asked my questions.
To wrap up what has been discussed, teachers should not reveal their social or political attitudes because may mislead students in their preferences due to the teacher's influence on students. Besides, mentioning social or political issues in the classes by teachers distract students that they will not be able to focus on their lessons.
- In recent years wind energy as a source of renewable and clear energy has become increasingly popular Unfortunately wind energy has one significant environmental drawback fast moving turbine blades pose serious threats to birds flying through wind farms V 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People learn better from their classmates or rather than their professors 90
- Question Dr Achebe When people are asked about the most important discoveries or inventions made in the last two hundred years they usually mention something very obvious like the computer or the cell phone But there are thousands of other discoveries or 65
- Some scientists have proposed an interesting way to slow down global climate change they want to increase the growth of phytoplankton in Earth s oceans by fertilizing the oceans with iron dust Phytoplankton are tiny ocean dwelling plants that can absorb g 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, at least, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35572139303 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75731092651 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2103464809 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.315789474 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2652626213 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979750462424 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662500827334 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20102401243 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506011964503 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, at least, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35572139303 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75731092651 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2103464809 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.315789474 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2652626213 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979750462424 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662500827334 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20102401243 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506011964503 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.