Your city or province has recieved a large donation of money to improve the education of children. It must choose between spending the money on improvement of early childhood education (for children ages 4 to 7) and spending the money on improvement of educaiton for older children (ages 11 to 14). Which do you think is the better opinion? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
The best way to increase your wealth is to invest money in your children, especially in their education. And, I personally believe that the younger they are the better will be result. That is why I would select the option to dedicate this money to children ages 4 to 7. In the following essay, I will elaborate on this idea.
To begin with, I think that in a period between 4 and 7 the love for education is forming. And it is government's responsibility to teach our children how to learn and how to obtain knowledge. The better it is done in early childhood the easier will be the educational process for older children.
My experience is a compelling illustration of it. I have two sons 15 years old and 8 years old respectively. When the former was at age 4 we lived in a military village with no access to good educational institutions. And the former had dramatic problems during studying at school. On the other hand, when the second son was born we moved to the regional center. It allowed him to visit the best courses and children's clubs. Currently, he has no problems with the school. I think that this example shows why money should be spent on early childhood education.
Secondly, there is not enough of kindergartens in my city. And it is a crucial problem not only for parents but also for the economy of the city. The mother or father has to be at home and spent time with the child till when the child will be ready to go to school. Thus, parents stay at home additional 3 or 4 years rather than contribute to their work. And to resolve this problem this donation should be spent to build new kindergartens and to enlarge current ones. I definitely think that the side effect of this approach will be the city's economic growth, and this additional money could be spent on other educational improvements for all categories of children
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the mentioned donation should be allocated to enhance early childhood education. This is because it will help children during future education, and, additionally, could help to boost the economy in my city.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill than people who learned it easily Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- teamwork 78
- The article in troduces the topic of function of horns of antilope and deer species 73
- The article and the lecture focus on the problem of building wildlife crossings 80
- The article introduces the topic of the function of the horns of antelope and deer species 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...educational process for older children. My experience is a compelling illustrati...
^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...years old and 8 years old respectively. When the former was at age 4 we lived in a m...
^^^^
Line 6, column 667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovements for all categories of children In conclusion, I strongly believe that t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, i think, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65147453083 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74589994463 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495978552279 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.420538782 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8636363636 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9545454545 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223668040553 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584713591334 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728676890664 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128857792058 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457472190961 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.