earthquakes
The reading and the lecture are both about finding ways to predict earthquakes. The author of the reading suggests some methods than can be use to predict earthquakes. The lecturer, however, rebuts the author's ideas. He thinks that the methods propossed in the reading part doe not hold clear evidence and are questionable.
To begin with, the author claims that one way to see that an earthquake is coming can be done by observation of animals's behavior. He says that animals act differently when they feel that an earthquake is about to happen. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He states that it is not true that animals change their behavior because of that. Also, he says that a minir trumbeling can not lead to earthquake.
Secondly, the reading part holds the idea that headaches occure in people can be another signal that an earthquake is approaching. On the other hand, the lecure oposes this statement. It says that headache is not a realible sign of it. This is a rare symptom and the magnetite is so small, therefor it can not be true.
Finally, the writer thinks that by measuring of the emisions of readon earthquake can also be predicted. The speaker opposes this idea, by sayin that this is not a practical way to predict earthquake and the emisions of radon is not a forecast for earthquakes.
In conclusion, there seems to be a lot of dissagrements between the passage and the lecture, that are unlikly to be solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 71 | view |
- people should spend money on things that are long lasting like jewerly rather than in personal short lived pleasures like traveling 60
- It is better for people to choose jobs that come with high salaries even though they do not enjoy doing it than to choose jobs that they enjoy but come with low salaries Use specific reasons and examples 70
- List some benefits and problems of having young kids play sports! 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ading suggests some methods than can be use to predict earthquakes. The lecturer, h...
^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ading suggests some methods than can be use to predict earthquakes. The lecturer, h...
^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...than can be use to predict earthquakes. The lecturer, however, rebuts the authors i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77075098814 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73231475271 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517786561265 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5861916033 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4375 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191905714804 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607432696896 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090609882295 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108539387641 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100841482626 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.