The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present.
The given Maps detail the urban developments that took place in the village of Ryemouth from 1995 till now.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the place has undergone numerous renovations resulting in a well-defined infrastructure, and better recreational facilities, while a few areas have been kept unaltered.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, in 1995, to the northeast corner of the layout, there was a farm area with an adjacent Forest Park just below it. However, over time, both have been replaced with a splendid golf course and tennis court respectively. Also, where there was a hotel in the South right bottom, just beside the road intersection, a new car park has been constructed to improve the hotel service.
Furthermore, there used to be some shops in the Southwest end along the main road, however, a restaurant chain takes up the place now. Also, just across the road, now, apartments can be seen in place of the fish market. Moreover, the middle road has been extended to the West to expand housing units with much better accessibility. In addition, the fishing port has gone in the favor of a Sandy beach. Despite many changes, a few residential units in the northwest zone and a cafe near the sea remained unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | Nyahmeo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Nyahmeo | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | trung12345 | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | Vũ Ngọc Lam | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-10 | Han Duyen | 78 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- The chart below give information about levels of education in Glasgow a city in Scotland in 2010 89
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 84
- The users of social media such as Facebook and Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95515695067 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82443582197 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627802690583 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2164724967 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09260286993 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383237262992 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919524873369 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871446139021 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127136984486 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95515695067 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82443582197 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627802690583 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2164724967 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09260286993 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383237262992 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919524873369 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871446139021 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127136984486 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.