Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?
It is argued that a person may become lost in tons of information. However, the different sources of information provide us with different points of view, including the views on the same object under the other angle, moreover the web share the additional blocks of data, which can help complete the whole picture and completely understand the topic. However misleading information may detrimentally affect the users of such information.
Indeed, the view of others’ is a valuable thing, especially in the field of work with project under strict deadlines and in terms of time pressure, where global opinions and views under different angles matter. For example, the team working on a project obtains information from different sources such as meetings with other people, however nowadays we have a very strong and powerful tool to obtain information in a much smarter and fastest way. So, the data from the Internet may be used to acquire different views on the problem and provide the only viable solution. The only problem in here is that the Internet may accumulate information from unreliable sources. We never know who posts the information on the Internet.
By the same token, the information obtained from the Internet may act as a “final block” or “last detail of the puzzle”. To be specific, it is impossible for a person to know everything in the whole world. Since Internet is available to wide range of users with completely different knowledge around the World, the complete data for each topic could be easily found on the web.
Furthermore, the misleading information may harm the researcher by making him to draw foolish conclusions, based on the lies. Detrimental effect from usage of wrong data could be uncountable. The mankind builds its future in twenty first century, highly relying on the global data and web. It is easily to create false images of persons to provide incorrect facts, which are unavailable to global public, by using the global web. Mostly, the sources from the Internet are available for changes from any unknown user, thus making it difficult to use data obtained from the global network. The Wikipedia, one of the largest e-libraries, demonstrates the situation discussed above, in which a person writes a post or a story treating the facts in a wrong way, discouraging the general public from using the web.
In conclusion, there is a strong connection between the worldwide development and the global web, and we can hardly build present without access to the global information. The global web provides the humanity with mostly unlimited sources of data, and the one, who may process it correctly, may expand his knowledge. However, each individual must nonetheless decide for themselves whether it is still a worthwhile expense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | ngaliulin | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | rpinisetti8 | 86 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | usef | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | shiiwem | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-03 | Sudan Devkota | 76 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Thousands of animals currently reside in zoos around the world Recently there has been much debate about the value of zoos in today s world Careful consideration of the facts reveals that zoos are unethical and should be closed First defenders of zoos say 76
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mammal known as Repenornamus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal s stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers have therefore suggested that R rob
- The wooly mammoth was a prehistoric animal that resembled an elephant and lived during the Ica Age Some versions of the species are known to have survived until 6000 BCE Its extinction is best explained by a combination of climate change and over hunting 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnet is available to wide range of users with completely different knowledge arou...
^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... World, the complete data for each topic could be easily found on the web. Furth...
^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...table. The mankind builds its future in twenty first century, highly relying on the global d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...nkind builds its future in twenty first century, highly relying on the global data and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13670886076 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76260885597 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516455696203 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4326990222 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.722222222 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214706964372 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662058576107 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564123315138 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114740262213 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850936337882 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.