Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? teachers in the past were more appreciated and valued by people than they were nowadays.
Being a teacher has been one of the most prestigious and respectful professions throughout history. Opinions are divided whether and to what extend around the question that teachers are appreciated as much as they were in the past years or not. Personally, I am of the confirmed opinion that teachers in the old years were more appreciated. I will stand my standpoint of view for two concrete reasons which have been stated in the following lines.
The first worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that since there were just a few numbers of teachers in the last decades, people valued them even more than they deserved. To be more specific, some communities had to wait a long time to have a teacher educating their beloved children who were going to be the future of their societies. Consequently, teachers were such valuable individuals needed to have advanced society. My grandfather's experience is an apt illustration of this. The village he was living in at that time was lack of a teacher for many years that they decided to explore cities to find one person to be the teacher of children in their village providing all necessities of his/her life but their hopes to find a teacher did not come true. As a result, since teachers were rare in the past years, they were more appreciated by social members because losing them was an irreparable mistake.
The second remarkable reason to be noted is that teachers in the old years well the teacher of the whole community as well as age-school children. Actually, they had responsibilities for people where they were teaching in. In the other words, in the current teachers' eyes, being a teacher is limited just to classes whereas in the old times not only did teachers act as a teacher inside the classes but also in the society, among people. Furthermore, teachers' opinions in the old years due to their scarce knowledge were more valued by people who hardly had formal education. Therefore, it is an undeniable fact that teachers because of their presence in their community and their knowledge had more respect among people.
To wrap up what has been discussed, it is my firm point of view that teachers in the last decades were more valued rather than rather the in the many years ago because there were just a few numbers of them that having a teacher was a blessing. Besides, teachers were the teacher both inside and outside classes in communities.
- The yellow crazy ant is one of the world s most destructive invasive species species that are not native to an area but rather introduced to it It has spread to many regions of Earth and caused great damage to native ecosystems In recent decades the crazy 90
- The production of electricity in nuclear power plants generates radioactive waste as a by product The waste is often placed in canisters containers but it remains radioactive for thousands of years emitting invisible radiation that is harmful to humans an 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs rather than choose jobs that are very different o their parents 87
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree that it is important for young people to learn some domestic skills or not 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 15.1003584229 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79326923077 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66911369174 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463942307692 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4013082282 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.294117647 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329021814319 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129629254465 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815802200687 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231616483563 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293725935459 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.