Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill yhan people who learned it easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I completely agree with the following statement. People who have had difficulties during their studies like nobody else understand the problems students are facing. They can define a proper way to teach them and give a lot of useful advices. Nevertheless, in my opinion, quality of teacher shouldn't be measured by difficulties they have had. First of all, personal qualities, values and dedication to their job define a teacher and give a fair representation of his or her abilities.
First and foremost, a person who have already overcome all possible difficulties and succeeded in his or her area of job, suits perfectly for a teacher. Compared to those, who have succeeded in something without putting as much effort as the first type, hard-workers know more material and had much more practice. They can identify and sort out students' mistakes, give them advices on how to increase their performance and personal skills. Moreover, such people tend to underestimate their capability and self-assess their work inappropriately, which can lead to even more productive actions and consequences, which can surpass all predictions.
Another valuable point is a personal recognition of students. In my consideration, teachers who completed tasks easily require the same performance and results from their apprentices. They tend to teach only the best ones, who have a natural talent or a pack of already appropriate skills. Of course, such teachers are only a drop in the bucket. In most cases, that situation occurs in olympic sports. The first type of teachers we discuss probably won't have too strict requirements for students. They will have more patience and understanding.
Overall, I consider people who have succeeded in a lot, dealing successfully with all the difficultieas as the best teachers and mentors. They will guide their students, retain stability of their mental health and motivate them by being an already successful representation of themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-27 | Llsnxbdjzbbab263646 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that it is always right for governments to ask people to move their businesses and houses to provide space for the construction of large structures new roads new dams etc 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- If you could go to some time and place in the future when and where would you go Why Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 60
- nbjdhfgoidsjkopq w 3
- nkldfngkler 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[4]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
...s during their studies like nobody else understand the problems students are facing. They ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...less, in my opinion, quality of teacher shouldnt be measured by difficulties they have h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, of course, first of all, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35048231511 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09378901747 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569131832797 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7892328499 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186339845216 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651326355244 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610122566572 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124797260531 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408937911087 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.