The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph provided illustrates the amount of different type of food consumed in a European nation from 1970 to 2014.
Overall, twenty-five years experienced an upward trend in the ingestion of Chicken while the opposite was true for the intake of the others. Moreover, Fish was the least commonly used food during this period.
As can be seen from the line graph, the consumption of Beef was the most popular food, at approximately 220 grams a piece, whereas the number of Fish consumed accounted for the lowest with around 60 grams. The figure for Lamb and Chicken were lower with nearly 150 grams.
Between 1979 and 2004, the country witnessed a bounce to around 250 grams in the figure of Chicken while the amount of consumed Beef grew, reaching a peak of about 240 grams in 1983, followed by a gradual drop to just over 100 grams in 2004. Likewise, there was a plummet of over 50 grams seen in the amount of Lamb in 2004, as compared to roughly 40 grams of the rest in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy of four countries from 1975 to 2000 89
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 10
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53333333333 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33927814127 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6579570634 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143322712479 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579376385343 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487177629709 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792109516732 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367906438768 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.