people’s attitudes are determined by their immediate situations or surroundings than by society as a whole.
There is a proverb that courtesy begets courtesy and this lesson initiates from the family. According to the prompt, people’s attitudes are determined by their immediate situations or surroundings than by society as a whole. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this prompt due to some legitimate logical flaw that I have interpreted below in three different ways.
To begin, every human is social being and born in a society. So before getting matured every human stays in a particular society and learns the rules regulation of that society. For instances, If a person grows in a rural or urban area, he definitely learns the strict discipline, obedient. He becomes more devoted, sedulous, meticulous, obedient and a martinet. Thus, he does not need any specific area or immediate situations to show their attitudes because he already comprehended it from their society by concomitant with other people and become more gregarious.
Further, to get proper judgement, instant attitudes for any immediate situations or surroundings plays a minor role and sometimes due to base on this instant attitudes, people take wrong decision. For instances, the judge should not give any sympathy about his judgement if the criminal's instant attitudes are imperturbable. The criminal may be feigned for getting sympathy. Even the leader does not take any pivotal decision observing someone's instant attitudes. However, it may be dangerous and pernicious for whole public. So everything should be measured getting credulous information such as getting information from society.
Finally, there are myriad deleterious effect about attitudes that are determined by immediate situations. Consequently, if you consider social, political, historical, and even in the health profession you cannot determine who is really dangerous for our whole nations.
Of course, someone prematurely argues that people’s attitudes are determined by their immediate situations or surroundings than by society as a whole. Until, I will not get proper information about the mentioned flaws, I will be easily persuaded.
- Many Mosac graduates gone to become well known and highly paid professional Musicians To support these recommendations they point out some three reasons 45
- the memorandum from the president of the Humana University in order to increase the enrollment and solve the problems of budget deficits at Humana University the students should initiate and promote online degree like those at Omni 53
- Mosart school of Music website Many Mosac graduates gone to become well known and highly paid professional Musicians To support these recommendations they point out some three reasons 45
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 52
- people s attitudes are determined by their immediate situations or surroundings than by society as a whole 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rpreted below in three different ways. To begin, every human is social bei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her people and become more gregarious. Further, to get proper judgement, instan...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h as getting information from society. Finally, there are myriad deleter...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly dangerous for our whole nations. Of course, someone prematurely argues th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, really, so, thus, for instance, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56074766355 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00894265341 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0024403557 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1666666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410336012439 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136923988425 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.246461429102 0.0758088955206 325% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253104951671 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135788348398 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.