The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The author, in the given prompt, avers that the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. I, with the author, mostly agree, and in the next three-paragraph, I will explain why I mostly agree with the author.
First of all, there are certain situations where healthy competition is needed for efficient leadership. For instance, in an organization, most of the young people, as they are neophytes, tend to lethargic towards their assigning works. If there is no competition, they will get no impetus for work. Because psychologically human being tends to do something better than others, people, who vie them. From the psychological viewpoint, the young novice leader in government, industry, or other fields, will always try to compete with their coworkers. Thus, in this particular situation, competition is a fulcrum for good leadership.
However, when the competition is invidious, it rather dampens the quality of leadership. In fact, when competition makes fracas, cooperation is mandatory to mitigate the situation. Indeed, most of the time, as we all are created differently, we tend to have disagreements, disagreements that may hamper the leadership quality, in fact, may ruin the organization. In those particular cases, cooperation is necessary to palliate the situation and to help flourish the organization.
Moreover, in the case of governments, to lead a peaceful relationship between two countries, cooperation is mandatory. For example, in the trade war between China and America, there is a huge economic loss of two countries until they reach an agreement, which is the result of cooperation. Say, for instance, the relationship between Iran and the USA. There is a discord, which is not solved till now, because of their unrestrained competition. If there was cooperation, the situation might have been far better. Thus, cooperation, in this type of fact, is mandatory.
In sum, though there are some situations, where competition may help flourish a government or organization, most of the time, unrestrained competition is insidious which we do not see directly.
- Economic impact of covid 19 The other side of the coin 67
- Economic impact of covid 19 The other side of the coin
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- Many of the world s lesser known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct 75
- Economic impact of covid 19 The other side of the coin 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mple, in the trade war between China and America, there is a huge economic loss o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36571428571 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28118445513 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4943328986 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8421052632 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33424379839 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870422307149 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128861840217 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163833306019 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119716107728 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.