You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
Jenny is conducting a research project on cell phone use. The chart shows the percentage of students, and parents of students, at Jenny’s school who owned cell phone over a 14 year period. The table provides the cell phone ownership rate nationwide over the same timeframe.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
Line chart displays timeline showing change in percentage of parents and children who own cellphones at Jenny's School from 2002 - 2016.
In general, overall gap between two lines representing percentage of cellphones owned by parents and their children respectively gradually diminishes. From 2012 - 2016 gap experiences a sharp reduction which earlier remained approximately constant from year 2006 - 2012. However only time period when gap widened was from year 2004 - 2006.
As the percentage of cellphone users nationwide increased, total percentage of student and parents also increased. Year 2016 experienced largest boom in cellphone usage with 96% of nation's population using cellphone and approximately 80% and 75% of parents and children owning a cellphone respectively. This shows that approximately equal number of parents and children owned cellphone in 2016 which appear large contrast from year 2002 when 60 % of nation owned cellphone and out of that parents of children studying at jenny's school who owned cellphone was about 50% but the percentage of student who owned a phone was very low - nearly 5%.
Another period that showed widening of gap was 2004-2006 at which, in 2004 approx 50% of parents owned cellphone and 10% of student owned it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | JAY9923 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | join2saurav | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | omegaji | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | anirudh8860 | 67 | view |
- Eventually technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 58
- The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University s social media advertising campaign organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university Summarize the information by select 56
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 75
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43147208122 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85261234144 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8500782795 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242251387351 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118542326214 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827403262522 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16771155592 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684207836408 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.