Archeological lost artifacts
The reading explains that in the 20th-century archeology faced three major problems in Britain. The professor in the lecture then explains the new guidelines created in the 1990s by Britain to address each of these problems.
First, the author states the major problem was that valuable artifacts were lost or destroyed because of construction projects. The professor explained Britain responded to this problem with a powerful new guideline. Before construction projects are started, the size must be examined first. If the site has archeological value, then builders, archeologists, and government officials must get together to discuss how the artifacts will be preserved. The builders will either build around the site or excavate and document the artifacts discovered. This is how Britain solved this problem.
Second, the author states that financial support for archaeological research was inadequate which prevented hundreds of archeological projects from happening. The professor explains that the government responded to this problem with a guideline that requires the construction company to pay for all the expenses. The construction company must pay for the initial examination as well as all work to preserve the artifacts. This is a new source of funding besides government funding, that will allow a far greater range of archeological projects to occur. This solved the problem of financial support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 3 | view |
| 2021-03-13 | Winner_007 | 3 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Safa Arshad | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | attia | 3 | view |
- reading paper is better or watching electronic devices 76
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 83
- Traveling alone is better or with a group and guide 70
- widespread knowledge or a particular subject 73
- Archaeological artifacts 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61395348837 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02891777506 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548837209302 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.880690933 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8461538462 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179775513315 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574085624378 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695430771497 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113092901604 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069397415494 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.