It has been suggested that everyone in the world want to own a car a tv and a fridge do you think disadvantages of such a development outweigh advantages.
21st century has experienced tremendous growth in terms of technology. We are surrounded by multiple electrical appliances, which has made our life more comfortable and economical. People often argue over the usages of television, car, and refrigerator; how greatly it has impacted our life. The pros and cons of these gadgets are discussed in the below paragraphs.
The technology up-gradation has helped the humankind in many significant ways. The way of our daily living has changed a lot, as compared to the past. The automobiles have made our travel arrangements more convenient. Most of the businessman prefers working in the car while travelling, for better utilization of time. Moreover, the entertainment and updates about the world are now readily available through televisions. One can know what is happening in the other part of the world, and the man landing on the moon was live telecasted all around the world, motivating to discover in-depth about science. Furthermore, the cold-storage technology like refrigerator has reduced the wastage of perishable food items, by increasing its sustaining life.
Nevertheless, there is always a limitation to the usages; otherwise, results turn out to be negative. For example, the increase in traffic due to easily accessible buying cars, subsequently, the rise in pollution, raised alarms for global warming. What is more, the children spending most of their time in front of the television watching shows or playing video games, impacted their lifestyle a lot. Furthermore, the younger generations prefer eating cold stored food, which has reduced nutrients and vitamins, instead of cooking raw food.
To sum up, as every garden has weeds, similarly, technology to has its disadvantages. If there are limitations to uses, and one can manage to utilize productively, it will always be positive for developing such products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | SANDHUPREET | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | umangrdoshi | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-26 | yousuf344 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-24 | parabshreyas | 11 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | Shreya shah | 88 | view |
- You recently organised an all day meeting for your company which took place in a local hotel In their feedback participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel but were unhappy about the food that as served for lunch Write a letter to the manage
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree Give reason for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience 78
- Nowadays more and more people have to compete with young people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are some possible solutions 61
- Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities in their free time Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own Discuss both these views and give your o 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the humankind in many significant ways. The way of our daily living has changed a l...
^^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...changed a lot, as compared to the past. The automobiles have made our travel arrang...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, while, for example, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40816326531 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10463550632 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663265306122 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5543766709 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5294117647 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0527304046043 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0138109492824 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223588536657 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0312216805582 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226951106928 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.