It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do advantages of this development for society outweigh the advantage?
Nowadays, everybody wants to have some electronic equipments like television, fridge and car for transportation. I think that wanting these types of equipment and vehicle can bring more problems for society, in the long run, compared to any advantages it might bring.
Admittedly, there are some basic benefits of having these equipments and vehicles. Among them, the first is that it can make life easy. Refrigerators are widely used to store the food, moreover, it also prevents the food to get spoiled. Similarly, the car has also become part of life as it is comfortable, convenient and most importantly time-saving. In fact, in some areas, the car has become a status symbol because of which people like to have it. Another reason is that these equipments can be used as a source of knowledge as well as for entertainment purpose. Today, there are a plethora of entertainment channels and programmes that one can watch on television, from which a person can broaden their horizons and additionally, add some entertainment in their monotonous life.
Nevertheless, despite the advantage above, I believe that it can make an adverse effect on the environment in the long run. First is that car emits dangerous gases like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. Refrigerators are not lagging in spoiling the mother earth because it emits the chloroform carbons which damages the ozone layer around the earth resulting in the rice of temperature. According to a recent survey which indicates that 30% of all pollutants that released to the environment are chlorofluorocarbons and carbon monoxide only. Furthermore, there is a direct impact too on humans that these equipment do, like health problems and wasting time on using it. Last but not the least, the equipment is now too expensive so that it impacts on the budgets of the households.
In recapitulation, everybody wanted to have these equipments and vehicles but I believe that it is a negative development for specifically in long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-30 | patel_paras7777@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
- An increasing number of people are now using dating websites to meet their second halves Do you think this tendency help people or does more harm than good 73
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do advantages of this development for society outweigh the advantage 73
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sector s contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 67
- The number of old people is increasing in many countries Some people think this cause problems whilst other people think that old people have an important role to play how far do you agree or disagree 73
- Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damages to environment while other think that the government should do something to help Discuss both 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
...e is a direct impact too on humans that these equipment do, like health problems and wasting ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, as for, i think, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14110429448 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09207322973 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530674846626 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5861402514 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156567412157 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507103613063 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592919513128 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119774279471 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701570554284 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.