jjjjj
Globally, many people consider that higher education pupils have the right to choose subjects related to their interests and habits whereas others believe that their curriculum must contain courses related to science and technical fields only. While some individuals think that selecting favourite subjects develop their offspring's creativity, I believe that opting courses related to technology served them an opportunity to have a bright future.
On the one hand, indeed having their favourite courses assists them to sustain their recreational activities. This can be explained by the fact that with having interested studying material, students can learn them more effectively and grasp it without much effort which helps them to create a career in the same field. For example, In India, the majority of successful photographers had opted photography skills from their college period as they have chosen a photography course as a major study. However, I believe that such type of skills cannot give them a lucrative occupation during their beginnig of life.
On the other hand, the vast majority of mothers and fathers who have an understanding of practical usage of skills, are always forcing their young ones to choose science and modern technological subjects. This is because such curriculum provides them a chance to get selected by much well-known organization during their last year of college period with well-paid salaries. For instance, In India, the majority of engineering candidates get selected every year during their final campus interviews with the administration's salary packages. Therefore, with having these courses students can get job securities.
In conclusion, although having creative subjects in university's curriculum make them more innovative in their life, I think parents should foster their teenagers to go for studying those contents that provide them higher work opportunities once they finish their higher education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-30 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behaviour What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 61
- ddddd 11
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary but a form of entertainment Do you think it is a positive or a negative development Give your opinion and examples from your experience 73
- fff 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'administrations'' or 'administration's'?
Suggestion: administrations'; administration's
... their final campus interviews with the administrations salary packages. Therefore, with having...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 32.9175257732 115% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 937.175257732 178% => OK
No of words: 297.0 206.0 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61279461279 4.54256449028 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80613421537 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 127.690721649 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 290.88556701 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6768711386 44.8134815571 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.545454545 76.5299724578 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 16.8248392259 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 4.34317383033 247% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 8.37731958763 221% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 70.7449484536 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 7.45979381443 201% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 8.71597938144 178% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 7.59969072165 129% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 41.2886597938 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 8.62886597938 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.