do you agree or disagree with this statement
the government should provide free internet to the whole citizens.
In current society, the internet has already become one of the most important things in our lives. It is not an overstatement that hardly does a day go without helping of the internet. In this case, there is a controversial issue that whether the government should provide internet for all citizens without charging. From my perspective, the government should not provide internet for all citizens without charging.
First of all, some students will be influenced by the freeing internet. This is because many parents do not allow their children to play video games through the internet, so most parents usually choose to close the internet sign during student’s worktime and sleeping time. Therefore, providing free internet for every citizen also means that students can access the internet at all times and without limits. For example, my little brother, 12 years old last year, was influenced negatively by the internet. Usually, the internet would be cut out before my brother sleeping by my parents. However, just a few days, my parents forgot to do this, so my brother played his video games until midnight everyday. Therefore, never did he have enough energy to take courses of next day, so he always could not focus on the lecture provided by his teachers, so his tutor reflected his bad expression to my parents. In this case, under the pressure of my mother, he admitted that he could not control himself to play video games when the internet is available, thus, it is easy to imagine that how many students will be badly influenced by the free internet.
Secondly, it is providing free internet to the whole society than increases the financial burden of the whole society. This is an extremely obvious fact that citizens will pay the fee of the internet before the government provides free internet. There is a specific research result to explain why the government’s financial burden will increase, about 800 million dollars were paid for internet fee to the whole internet companies last year by citizens, and according to the taxes law of our country, these internet companies needed to pay ten percent of income to our country. However, today the government will provide free internet for the whole citizens without any charging, so it means that the government will never the taxes that were paid by internet companies. In this case, the income of the government will decrease dramatically leading to a serious financial burden to the government.
To sum up, providing free internet to all numbers is not a practical thinking, because it will lead to many negative influences to students and will lead to a serious financial burden problem to the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-01 | Bingdong Li | 73 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with this statement the government should provide free internet to the whole citizens 73
- do you agree or disagree with the statement that should students take the course taught in a traditional way that teachers speak and student listen or the course that student discuss and talk 70
- the most important problems will be solved during our lives time 79
- people prefer to cook food by themselves or eat at cafeteria 70
- no 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...r played his video games until midnight everyday. Therefore, never did he have enough en...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 953, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s case, under the pressure of my mother, he admitted that he could not control hi...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxes'' or 'tax's', 'taxis's'?
Suggestion: taxes'; tax's; taxis's
... year by citizens, and according to the taxes law of our country, these internet comp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03587443946 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67021061605 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470852017937 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6210260437 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317027343515 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128286898092 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895995754695 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200954613181 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833830856099 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.