It has been said that reading improves our imagination and language skills better than watching TV.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed by some that books have a considerably more positive influence on our imagination as well as language development rather than viewing TV. This essay fully agrees with this statement, since reading allows people to create the scenery of events in their mind and helps to widen their vocabulary range.
Firstly, people can not see the heroes from the stories they read, but they can imagine them. In other words, people need to use their imagination and creativity in order to depict the exact hero by reading his description in the book. Narrative stories allow readers to immerse themselves into the book and feel the same emotions as their favourite characters do. According to the recent studies, people are more sensitive while reading compared to watching , since some readers can absorb the information in the way that is far more impressive for them. Therefore, when people are given a chance whether to read a simple book or watch a film, many of them opt for the former version.
Secondly, books can supply people with a wide range of vocabulary. This can be very beneficial for children to develop their language skills. Infants are not familiar with many words, so in the process of reading they can come across different unfamiliar words and their usage, the meaning of which they can comprehend from the context. The latest research has shown that an average adult, who has read a lot, can hardly have any difficulties during negotiations in his workplace in comparison with those who has preferred to watch TV. What is more, people, who read more can speak by using grammatically correct sentences with appropriate vocabulary . That is why reading is not only recreational but a useful activity as well.
To conclude, reading allows people to think, imagine, create and enrich their lexical resources , which are far more useful that watching TV that does not require the usage of creativity.
- It has been said that reading improves our imagination and language skills better than watching TV Do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- Some people think that it is better to leave their home country for improving their work and living opportunities Others believe that it is better to stay in their home country 86
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...itive while reading compared to watching , since some readers can absorb the infor...
^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ct sentences with appropriate vocabulary . That is why reading is not only recreat...
^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reate and enrich their lexical resources , which are far more useful that watching...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as well as, in other words, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0031152648 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60336533167 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576323987539 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0856328082 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159284559963 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596754744443 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403884947952 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108794162191 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319428959048 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.