The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age group in UK who used the internet everyday from 2003-2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant.
1The bar graph depicts the proportion of Internet usage in Britain areas differentiate through their age group in 5 categories in the year between 2003 to 2006.
Overall, it can be manifested that the younger people used the internet in more amount whereas the older once uses least.
To begin with, the plethora of Britain resident members used the Internet in which most of the internet used by a new generation there is over 80% of used Internet for 4 years and in 2005 it reaches to the 100%. It was the highest internet usage ratio. Furthermore, age groups between 25 - 44 used the internet which is gradually increased by 50% to 80 % in 2003 to 2006 respectively.
Moreover, there are similar variations noticeable in between the age group of 45 to 54. Which is 60% in 2003 it increased by 20% in 2006. Whereas the fourth category of age group 55-64 age is approximately 30 % for 2003 to 2005 which increased in 2006 with two-tenth. In contrast, senior citizens over 65% used the Internet least in an amount of less than 20% for 2004 to 2006 and it can be present that not often used of the Internet used by older in 2003.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-10 | VIDHI PARMAR | 67 | view |
- Nowadays families are not as close as they used to be What do you think are the causes of this What can be done to make families closer 56
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
- The graph below gives information about the numbers of cases of diarrhoea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992
- In some countries foreign language is taught at primary school Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The Graph below gives information about Dubai gold sales in 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e in between the age group of 45 to 54. Which is 60% in 2003 it increased by 20% in 2...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5637254902 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58478936908 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9978675232 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229925906731 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108609474187 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374791571614 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146381745889 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461248465923 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.