Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
living in the countryside or a big city both have their pros and cons. Compared with adults, children tend to be easier affected by the environment, so, it is critically important that all children be raised in a supportive and healthy environment. I think that it is better for children to grow up in a city.
To begin with, children can have a better education in a big city without a reservation since there are many good quality schools, they can find more beneficial schools that have an effective education system to provide possibilities according to their skills and ability, also growing up in a big city would broaden children’s horizons because there are teachers with greater ability and richer educational experience, as a result, children would enjoy a higher quality of education.
In addition to that, being healthy and maintaining it is very important for children while growing up, in a big city there are very health services and experienced qualified doctors because hospitals in a big city are invested more than the ones in the countryside so living in big cities is more beneficial for them to stay healthy and to lead a better life
In the end, I believe that it is better for children to grow up in cities because it provides them a better education and health services.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations Use details and examples to support your answer 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
living in the countryside or a big city ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Living
living in the countryside or a big city both h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r for children to grow up in a city. To begin with, children can have a bette...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enjoy a higher quality of education. In addition to that, being healthy and m...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay healthy and to lead a better life In the end, I believe that it is better ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, i think, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 1977.66487455 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 223.0 407.700716846 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86098654709 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81946192763 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 212.727598566 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 618.680645161 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.6003584229 24% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.1344086022 219% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 197.022435271 48.9658058833 402% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 216.8 100.406767564 216% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.6 20.6045352989 216% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.8 5.45110844103 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253538511637 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154133041951 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795652626359 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180494897962 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327454022992 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.8 11.7677419355 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 58.1214874552 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 10.1575268817 202% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.0537634409 195% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.