Nowadays more and more people have to compete with young people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are some possible solutions

Essay topics:

Nowadays more and more people have to compete with young people for the same jobs.
What problems does this cause?
What are some possible solutions?

It is undeniable that most of the population globally are depended on jobs to earn daily bread and butter. With the development of technology, the old-fashioned techniques of working on paper have reduced a lot. Most of the systems are now computer-based. Younger generation being very well used to it does not find it challenging to get a new job, owing to this the generations' competition level has reduced. This essay highlights the issue and possible solution on this agenda.
To embark with, the substantial rise in the use of technology, the adults are finding it difficult to compete with the younger generation. As most of the systems are computer-integrated, the adolescents are comparatively grabbing the opportunities to their favour. Furthermore, the younger people are ready to work at less payscale, when compared to adults, their conventional hard work and time dedicated are less considered. Nevertheless, the younger generation switch jobs frequently for better working environment and salary as compared to adults.
However, the government is initiating various schemes to reduce the technological gap between old and young; at the same time, many developers create the platform easy to use by the old-school people. With the proper integration of human resources; modern minds working together with experienced brains can bring a fruitful outcome required for the business.
To sum up, the recruiters must define the roles, with the expectations; they must realize the difference created by the work-experience. Different initiatives must be taken to train and develop the computer skills of adults to minimize this problem.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-18 parabshreyas 61 view
2020-11-09 kdg20 67 view
2020-04-12 somu 89 view
2020-04-12 somu 84 view
2018-04-29 lubna 1 77 view
Essays by user parabshreyas :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
...used to it does not find it challenging to get a new job, owing to this the generation...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...ing to get a new job, owing to this the generations competition level has reduced. This ess...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44140625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27510352517 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62109375 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0761659527 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16488585945 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531401938928 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376481100792 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883436238709 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325585872432 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.