The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990-2010
The bar chart illustrates data on the proportion of British humans devoting the amount of money to charity by different age groups from 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that, the majority of people giving money aged 36-50 compared to other groups in 1990. The weakest level can observe in 2010 aged 18-25.
First and foremost, the most striking feature is that, there was an increasing trend in the proportion of British people aged 36-50 in 1990 at 43 percent which is that, the percentage of people who give money to charity accounted 35 percent. The lowest portion revealed the number of humans devoting money who aged 18-25 and reach about 17 percent. Similar trends can experience for the next stage groups that, there have been a significant peak at 32 percent respectively. ( aged 26-35, over 65).
Turning to 2010, there was a significant rise in the percentage of British populations who donate money ( just over 40 percent respectively) for those aged 51-65. After then, the both aged groups of 36-50 and over 65 ages followed by a similar patterns in 2010. Lastly, the contribution of group who aged 26-35 which has been a gradual rocket 17 percent higher rather than aged group of 18-25.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-20 | Nurimov Elyor | 78 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The graph shows the avarage growth in domestic products in wealthy countries countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2021 73
- The chart gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 92
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Aged
...icant peak at 32 percent respectively. aged 26-35, over 65. Turning to 2010, th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of British populations who donate money just over 40 percent respectively for th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8932038835 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48266684229 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4933909245 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311852604598 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132642467962 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854832825222 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219819688872 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034811714973 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.