Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a difference.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is often thought that, the environment can being modified only by government and large enterprises rather than individuals, typical industrial services are uselesss for this purpose. I completely agree with this given statement.
First of all, the highest enterprises can have to the ability to invest the amount of money to help the environment cleaners. To reduce emission of pollutants which are generated during manufacturing various products so, the greatest investment is required to install equipment to remove pollutants. In addition, environmentally, friendly raw materials might compass extensive cost rather than increasing a range of trees to protect our planet. It is often believed that, the state government and large corporations should control environmental emissions with liability also, can invest amount of money to alter convinient condition.
On the one hand, proportion of people plays a crucial role to create the environmental matters. To do this, government should contribute to improvement of the environment by changing laws so that humans have to eliminate to drive personal cars on the weekends. Moreover, the government can direct people by law to the use of public transportations rather than their own cars. To do this, we can able to avoid amount of gas from cars can reduce and then the quality of atmosphere will be better. In order to solve this ambition also, there are a few measures needed to taken by the government.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that, government and large enterprises have been improved the environment by using a variety of methods which are impossible for individuals to implement by anyhow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-22 | Nurimov Elyor | 73 | view |
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2021 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The chart gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 92
- The graph shows the avarage growth in domestic products in wealthy countries countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37404580153 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09996983017 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3110846428 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259832429102 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831723088977 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067655708187 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151349964445 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383068484943 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.