One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think that the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
More than 7 billion people live on our planet. And this number does not stop growing. Extending the lives of people thanks to improved medicine is not bad, since everyone wants their loved ones to live for a long time. But if you look at it from the other side, it does not seem good. Since the birth rate all over the world is large, and prolonging the life of people will double the world's population. This will greatly affect the less developed countries, since the economy in these countries is not so good. And many people may be unemployed and unable to support their families. Consequently, the amount of poverty in such countries will increase. You can also take well-developed countries in these countries, such a problem is unlikely to appear, but if the population begins to increase, more residential areas will be needed. To build residential complexes and other residences, more territories are needed. These countries will start deforestation and liberate the zone. And this will have a bad effect on the nature of the planet, on its flora and fauna. In addition, there are completely different problems with prolonging the life of people. These are problems with the person himself. Extending a person's life does not mean improving the body. After all, old age will befall each person. And the older a person is, the older his body is. It will be difficult for an elderly person to live on even if medicine can maintain health in the body for later life. Therefore, I believe that the advantages of this do not exceed its disadvantages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-20 | ZarinaLady | 56 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think that the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 in 2021 and future projection for 2025 18
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ging the life of people will double the worlds population. This will greatly affect th...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ms with the person himself. Extending a persons life does not mean improving the body. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, after all, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7947761194 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62998828566 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8620780583 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.6315789474 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1052631579 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172906325371 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499058634279 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459098772099 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172906325371 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.