The below charts show the spending on both countries between 1980 and 2008
The charts compare the five categories of household expenditure in the UK and Newzealand in the year 1980 and 2008.
Overall, the emerging fact from the chart is that the percentage of spending on food and drink declined in both countries, whereas the expenses on utility bills surged.
Looking in more details at the food and drinks around one-third of people of New Zealand spend their income on it, while the equivalent figure for the United Kingdom was 29%. By contrast, both regions experienced a slight increment in expenditures on utility bills for average home from 27% to 31% in New Zealand and from 26 to 28% in the United Kingdom.
Marching forward, in both years investment on leisure activities remained higher in Uk as against New Zealand. Interestingly, a similar amount of money spent on other categories in both years for the UK and New Zealand, which was 11% and 9% respectively. Nextly, in terms of transport there was negligible decrease was noticed in both regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-01 | Manvir singh | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | ahmed ahmed | 11 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | ahmed ahmed | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | ahmed ahmed | 11 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | ahmed ahmed | 75 | view |
- In the future no body will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree to this opinion 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 89
- Adult youths are often called up for working for the development of communities Some people say that they should work voluntarily whereas others say that they should get paid Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...ed Kingdom. Marching forward, in both years investment on leisure activities remain...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he UK and New Zealand, which was 11% and 9% respectively. Nextly, in terms of tra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92814371257 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76208274302 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.1779370999 44.8134815571 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 76.5299724578 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 16.8248392259 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 4.34317383033 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155357688841 0.216113520407 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076385853222 0.0766984524023 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542073788657 0.0603063233224 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109338974285 0.12726935374 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531535274856 0.0580467560999 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 8.37731958763 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.