The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar graph compares the projected annual attendance numbers for the Grandville stadium across three years after a major renovation project. Overall, the attendance is expected to increase at the stadium, with the concerts expecting the biggest improvement and the sporting events expecting the least.
The foot fall at the concerts as well as theater events is expected to more than double by 2030. Theater attendance is expected to double from approximately 20000 in 2020 to nearly 45000 each year by 2030. Concerts on the other hand are forecasting a much more significant increase from around 40000 attendees in 2020 to almost 120000 attendees by 2030, a whopping 200% improvement. A much more subtle change is expected in sporting events by 2030 with an addition of approximately 10000 - 15000 to the initial attendance of around 152000 in 2020.
By 2030, the sporting events are expected to remain the main event at the stadium at around 160000 attendees, followed by concerts expected to bring in 12000 attendees. Despite a projection doubling the attendance, theater is still expected to still pale in comparison to the other two events in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | preetir160 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | JAY9923 | 74 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | amat_96 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | anirudh8860 | view | |
| 2020-08-20 | anirudh8860 | view |
- The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant James Park 2017 5 000 monthly users James Park Pos 73
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write a 73
- Education from preschool through university should be paid for by the government and therefore free to students To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Education from preschool through university should be paid for by the government and therefore free to students To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group while others would rather work alone Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17553191489 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79633509006 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3849867628 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161873109898 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845821574485 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714736357151 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129718680362 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632400596678 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.