Effects of electronic devices
Both the reading and the lecture are about the effects of using electronic devices. The passage states that people nowadays prefer to use electronic devices which cause serious side effects on humans and provides three bad effects to endorse its idea. However, the professor states that the mentioned effects of electronic devices are not true and gainsays each of them.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that screens affect people's critical thinking ability because the information we get online is not professional and authentic. So, the people do not get an update and reliable knowledge. On the other hand, the speaker explains that paper does not improve a person's thinking parameters. In paper information, not only it is associated with a particular author but also the opinion are biased which is something not healthy for people's learning. In contrast, there are different viewpoints of various people on the internet which is accessed through screens. Thus, it improves the quality of thinking.
Next, the professor further points into the details by mentioning side effects are not only limited to mobile phones and computers but also reading from paper and books as it causes headaches and stiffness in the neck. He explains that the only solution is to change body habits while using learning materials either electronic or paper. Taking regular breaks and stretching your body is a profound solution to this problem not avoiding electronic devices. These claims refute the author's implication about electronic devices' harmful effects on the eyes and brain cells by the light of these devices and electromagnetic rays coming out of them.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by mentioning addiction towards mobile phones which hinders interaction between people and affects their social skills. The professor in the lecture refutes this reason by showing the inaccuracy of the author that electronic devices improve people's social skills. They could find a wide range of topics and shared feelings of people online. Therefore, it helps to build their ability of being social with other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | HRBM | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | m_aalaei | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | m_aalaei | 76 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | Safa Arshad | 80 | view |
- signs of volaco eruption 71
- Ways to lift heavy rocks to build an Egyptian pyramid 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Living today is more comfortable and easier than when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Cloud seeding 70
- REduction salt level in Salton lake 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...er explains that paper does not improve a persons thinking parameters. In paper informati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...tronic devices. These claims refute the authors implication about electronic devices ha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33727810651 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57963057244 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55325443787 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6096439883 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.117647059 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351037519641 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107573808223 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143929274081 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231862275738 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204739501636 0.0443174109184 462% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.