Success is only a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the current world, people are being ringed in a rat race where the connotation of life orbits around wealth and fame. What remains questionable is whether luck is fundamentally the determinant element of success. From my perspective, diligence and the urge for amelioration are substantially more decisive whilst luck must not be considered as the principal factor of the attainment.
Diligence and the yearn for improvement are more pivotal than luck. It is irrefutable that some people were born in affluent families and grew up inheriting quintessence and property without the need of being laborious. Counting on luck, some people stand a chance of becoming rich yet not always bound to be as jubilant as they seem.
In other words, it is such a paradox that some people are of the mindset which accomplishment counts on luck. There may have been an ample amount of people whose success relies upon the matter of luck, yet such fortune only comes conceding the actuality of them being sufficiently industrious. Granted that a person was born with innate talents and flourishing conditions, it would be nonsensical in terms of not knowing how to take advantage of them. Divergently, oneself should make good fortune find them by putting themselves under pressure and be filled with the aspiration to succeed. Will of steel and intense determination would have a person conquering the triumph and seizing for people’s attention. In contradiction, a procrastinative person with an overreliance on luck would let the key of success slip away. Life nowadays is more competitive with opportunities seeking for people with outstanding competence, therefore, only the ones who put effort and time in their work may succeed.
To draw a fair conclusion, success depends on various factors and luck is considered as a minor element. Hence, one should consecutively attempt for new ideas and trials as no such things go without a hitch. A firm mindset with the will of achieving higher goals is necessitated for the provision in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...actor of the attainment. Diligence and the yearn for improvement are more pivotal than l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: MODAL_OF[2]
Message: It's never correct to use "of" after a modal verb. Use 'Will have'.
Suggestion: Will have
... filled with the aspiration to succeed. Will of steel and intense determination would h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12874251497 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01678910927 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595808383234 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7701092814 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134086087429 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505843864028 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068604480299 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822626681756 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357557754023 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.