The bar chart shows the patterns of British families’ budget distribution on domestic and overseas travel across different age groups in a single year.
The bar chart illustrates the patterns of British families’ budget distribution on domestic and overseas travel across different age groups in a single year.
Overall, households’ travel budgets were not evenly distributed depending on the age, with those aged 50-64 spending most on national tourism and those who are between 65 and 74 on international. It is also noticeable that regardless of the age, families spent more on tourism in the UK than abroad.
As for local tourism, young people spent nearly 500 pounds, compared to approximately 730 expended by 30-49-year-olds. An outlier was an age range between 50 and 64, who allocated as much as 750 pounds (the highest amount in the UK). However, senior age citizens’ travel costs were significantly less, especially with 75 and older people spending the least, at about 200 pounds.
By contrast, international travel expenditure was the greatest with those aged 65-74 (over 200 pounds). The British before 30 had the modest budget for travelling overseas (barely more than 50 pounds). The rest age brackets had similar travel costs, holding at 150 and 200 pounds.
- Whereas the author of the reading says that these television appearance is of a great benefit to everyone the lecture cast doubts on the main points made in the reading providing three reasons 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyments doing things they like to do rather than things they should 80
- The chart gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 78
- The bar chart shows the patterns of British families budget distribution on domestic and overseas travel across different age groups in a single year 89
- The chart shows market shares of five industrial spheres in the national budget in 2005 and 2015 along with the predictions by 2025 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2320441989 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91153406569 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657458563536 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.181364315 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359897426582 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168509525244 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.258000576442 0.0843802449381 306% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314193377827 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.33422625218 0.0819641961636 408% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.