Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
Some people hold the view that protecting the environment is the responsibility of governments, which is not residents' mission. They are hardly capable of doing anything. Personally, I disagree with this view for several reasons.
There are certain ways that individuals can conserve environment. The key way is that people should recycle rubbish in the workplace, school or public place. For instance, some students have to participate in recycling campaigns in their school on a weekly basic, which is very useful for the natural. If students did not come, they would be underestimated their lifestyle. Therefore, thanks to schools' campaign, it is good direction to reduce the pollution and preserve natural resources. Furthermore, although some location have sanitation workers referred as office, school or event venues, some people should enhance awareness of urban landscape protection. As a result, their action can able to raise the city image in the eyes off tourists.
There are stronger reasons why the responsibility for protecting the environment is not only politicians, but also individuals. The most vital reason is that if the environment is polluted, the consequences will disadvantage everybody, regardless of the profession. To give just one example, because of exhaust fumes, some people are being breathing toxic air lead to their weak health, especially elderly people. Additionally, even their offspring's well being is also threatened if they are born and raised in such a polluted atmosphere. Hence, preserving their habitats is synonymous with protecting their future generation.
In conclusion, it is clear that we must address the risks of the environment, and I completely disagree with those who argue that residents have not role in conserving the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-25 | ngannguyen0212 | 78 | view |
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 78
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 The pie charts illustrate the proportion of workers in manufacturing sales and services sectors in both towns at intervals of fifty years between 67
- the diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- Task 2 Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50362318841 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10148948572 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.009715617 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117450069003 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427546539055 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604507914901 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757745613417 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337185155092 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.