The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending in 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest.
The charts give information about cases of arrests from 1990 to 1994.
It is clear that the proportion of men who were arrested was much higher than that of women. Overall, a majority of both genders were arrested for public drinking.
The percentage of males breaking the laws resulting in arrests was nearly four times higher than that of females, at 32% and 9%, respectively. For both sexes, the most common reason for being arrested was public drinking, with approximately 30% for men and just under 40% for women. This offense, along with assaults, at around 15% to 20% for both men and women, were the only types of offense which females tended to commit more than their male counterparts.
Drunk drinking accounted for about 26% of cases of men’s arrests, which was twice as high as the figure for women. For the remaining categories, the percentage for each gender maintained a minimal range of 13% to 19%. Four percent of female offenders and seven percent of male offenders gave no reasons for their arrest.
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The chart shows UK immigration emigration and net migration between 1999 and 2008 78
- What are the differences between fast food and traditional food 89
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending in 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48282919596 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2565782966 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22207569412 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103354530134 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562158791713 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152899540252 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339190546695 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.