The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below shows how consumers spend their money on different categories of items in five countries, namely Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
It is obvious that Turkish people spent the highest expenditure on food, drinks, tobacco and leisure, education. While that, the highest amount of money spent on clothing and footwear was recorded in Italy. Overall, money allocated for food, drinks and tobacco always stayed at the dominant position in all five countries.
Approximately one third of the money is spent on food, drinks and tobacco in Turkey, followed by Ireland as the second-highest with 28.91%. This country also had the highest expenditure on leisure and education, with 4.35%. The largest amount of money spent on clothing and footwear belonged to Italy, with exactly 9%.
The lowest percentage of money on food, drinks and tobacco was 15.77% in Sweden, and this nation also had the lowest figure for clothing and footwear, accounting for only 5.40%. Leisure and education, however, seemed to be least preferred by Ireland, as only 2.21% of money is spent on this category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2022-08-03 | rachell | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 11 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveyed asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summarize th 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55195398387 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2009729219 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0717481486373 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343990911538 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774465324584 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700010799633 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104533116521 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.