The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart provides information about percentages of divorces in such countries as Sweden and Finland over the period between 2011 and 2015. Overall, it can be clearly seen that proportions Sweden had more divorce rates than Finland, and percentages widely fluctuated in both countries.
According to the chart, it is vividly shown that, during the first 3-year period from 2011 to 2014, the proportion of divorce in Sweden was significantly more than in Finland. Moreover, in 2012, rates reached a peak in Sweden with almost 50%, while in Finland it was nearly 33% with the lowest rate all over the period.
On the other hand, from 2012 there was an upward trend for percentages of divorce in Finland rose steadily around 33% to just over 40%. However, in Sweden rates of divorces experienced a decrease from approximately 49% and ended at around 36%. At the end of the period, in 2015, Finland had more divorce rates than Sweden with 40% and 36% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | anthao42@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | anthao42@gmail.com | view |
- Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. 71
- The line graph below gives information about the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 56
- The advantages of English spreading as a global language will continue outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94512195122 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60487205398 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8856023869 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164907038191 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940068375442 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484835637872 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126144148265 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240176245383 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.