The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar charts provide the data about weight measurements of different groups of age of Charlestown over the 60-year period. Overall, it can be clearly seen that there was a wide fluctuation in both time periods.
According to the charts, it is clearly seen that the majority of inhabitants of Charlestown with different types of age groups had an “ideal” weight class in 1955. In addition, in the last century, from the age 20 to 39 there nobody suffered with obesity, and the rate of obesity started from the age group 40-49 and reached a peak of 10% in the age group 50-59. Moreover, for weight classes “overweight” and “underweight”, there were widely variations.
On the other hand, in 2015, there was an upward trend of percentage of obese people and ended at almost 60% at the age group 60-69. Regarding “ideal” weight measurement, it witnessed a decrease as the people got older and reached a low of approximately 4% at age group from 60 to 69.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | endriksugianto.es | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Mohsensnake | 11 | view |
| 2021-03-26 | anna103 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 67
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83928571429 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99375176045 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9444015112 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937826885324 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499985921073 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411094739465 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069239792247 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171355292819 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.