Some people believe that reading sotries from a book is better than watching TV or playing comouter games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people hold the view that reading book benefits for young children in comparision with others referred to as watching television or playing games on the Internet. Although I concur with this view up to a point, I find it hard to believe that this is true in every case.
There are certain reasons why youngsters are able to gain some positive meanings from reading a large number of books. The key reason is that reading helps enrich vocabulary. For instance, there are several new vocabulary that adolescents should learn when they read stories from a book to understand easily the passage. As a result, if they have better academic performance, they will get vital knowledges before making tests in their school or writing better in their workplace. Furthermore, it is not only provide vocabulary, but also improve and change their lifestyle. Hence, their stories are get an example of offspring who can raise awareness of life skills from authors.
There are stronger reasons to argue that watching TV or playing computer games have more beneficial to young children. The most essential is that when adolescents concentrate their time on watching television, they would have an opportunity to cultivate another languages in the world. To give just one example, some children could improve English via Americian films or England films on the Internet if they have leisure time. Thus, youngsters are able to communicate with foreigner when they come to different countries. Additonally, playing computer games need to constantly think of strategies to win. Although it is too difficult, this has a positive impact on their decision making skills. Especially, they can overcome some issues that happen in their workplace.
In conclusion, it is clear that some people should distribute their time between reading books and watching films or playing computer games. In my opinion, both this activities have more advantegous over children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-05 | ngannguyen0212 | 73 | view |
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience 61
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- the diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ain some positive meanings from reading a large number of books. The key reason is that reading h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ing computer games. In my opinion, both this activities have more advantegous over c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22044728435 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70906172001 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571884984026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8899092881 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1176470588 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232611173141 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729167974511 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764566170881 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155488314317 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384840122403 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.