The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip from 2010 to 2015.
The two maps compared the development of the town center, Islip in 2010 and in 2015.
Overall, There have been significant changes in infrastructure, including extra roads, bus station, and shopping center moreover town of the center increased in size.
Initially, in 2010, the main road had been running through the shopping street, both ends branched to school and park. The school had been situated in the southwest which was just outside of the road. Another branch ends at Park which placed to the east of Islip. While, countryside and housing area were bilateral of the shopping street.
By 2015, there was a considerable growth in the size of Islip town. The town surrounded by a dual carriageway on the contrary main road replaced by a sidewalk. The north side of the shopping street had been replaced into a new housing, car park, shopping center, and bus station. Furthermore, the park became smaller on the contrary school building had been rose in size, new housing added to the west of the park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-14 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 89
- Percentage of UK people who consumed the daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry 11
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89534883721 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59479551491 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7842728405 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182788030967 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945649299858 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129059161239 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173730751736 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154018426128 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.