The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town (Ashby) and in the UK as a whole in 2008.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of people who were 23 to 65 years old in various employments in Ashby and in the United Kingdom as a whole in the year 2008.
Overall, while the majority of people living in Ashby had personal-service related job, most of United Kingdom inhabitant were employed in Office work. In the UK, there were more professional workers than in Ashby. Ashby had the higher proportion of people who were unemployed people than in the UK
In Ashby, 14% of people were unemployed, compared with 10% in the UK. Similarly, the rate of construction workers in Ashby was also higher than in the UK with 16% and 10% respectively. Likewise, 21% of Ashby dwellers had personal-service related job followed by 17% of people living in the UK.
In contrast, the proportion of Ashby inhabitant who were employed in professional and technical work at 8% and 9% was lower than in the UK at 14% and 17%. People working in shops or offices in 2 both places made up for nearly the same percentages at 14% and 18%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 92
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian towns 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, similarly, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89115950522 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1398551596 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256954580703 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121667237935 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579734945239 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167921901566 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431417749203 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.