The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present.
The two maps compared the development of a town named Ryemouth in 1995 and the present. Overall, there have been significant changes in infrastructure, housing, and facilities over the period given.
Initially, in 1995, the farmland and housing areas parallel located in the north. The main road runs from east to west, branched to the north. To the south of farmland, a forest park had been placed. Shops and fish markets are situated in the southwest, which was bilaterally placed on the main road. Furthermore, there had been the hotel and café around the intersection which was separated. Moreover, a fishing port was settled down in the south that connected with the sea.
Currently, the arrangement of the housing area’s structure has been changed slightly. Not only a golf and tennis course has been built instead of farmland which increased in size, but also forest parks and fishing ports were removed. On both sides of the main road, shops converted into restaurants, fish markets renovated by apartments. The hotel has been expanded with car parks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | Nyahmeo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Nyahmeo | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | trung12345 | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | Vũ Ngọc Lam | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-10 | Han Duyen | 78 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry 11
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip from 2010 to 2015 69
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08571428571 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6942357214 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2280331367 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1666666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0812374710225 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375759828054 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10695434863 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854227283667 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107167244266 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.