People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks why and what can be done to reduce sugary drinks consumption?
In this day and age, types of drinks that are sugar added are widely used in the world even in less developed countries. Discussed below are several reasons for this upward trend and some practical measures to address the situation
There are two principal reasons supporting the idea that citizens have a tendency to consume more sugary substances. The most significant point to consider is that drinks that are sugar added it’s more flavorful than the non-sugar ones. Sweet drinks and food, which are high in calories, often make a strong impression on human’s taste, stimulate our sensory nerves but then make the users crave and even addicted to them. Additionally sweet drinks from large firms such as Coca-Cola, Suntory, to name but a few, are now globally sold on the market and served in every restaurant, cinema or even on the street, at a relatively reasonable price. As a result, people choose these drinks rather than mineral water not only for its popularity but also for better taste despite the same price
Since such issues are serious, measures should be implemented immediately to avoid adverse impacts if the situation continues. First and foremost, it is imperative that individuals should be well aware of the detrimental effects of overusing sweet drinks. If the consumers know that sugary drinks are the main culprits of such serious diseases, including obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure and even heart disease, they may soon cut down on them to protect their health and encourage others to give up that habit. Besides, official states could impose higher taxes on sugar-based drinks. Having been used to buying tasteful drinks at a cheap price, users would be disappointed with having to pay more and finally back to use mineral water, whose price remains stable and reasonable to all walks of life.
In conclusion, the above-mentioned facts outlined the explanations for why people prefer drinks that are sugar-based. Both the state and citizens should join hands to resolve this problem, ensuring better and healthier lifestyles for everyone
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative affect on society Discuss and give your opinion 84
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among people in society Do you think the advantage outweighs the disadvantage 89
- Men and women employed in full time jobs should share theresponsibilities of household chores Do you agree or disagree Share relevant personal experiences 89
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctical measures to address the situation There are two principal reasons supporti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... users crave and even addicted to them. Additionally sweet drinks from large firms such as C...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, may, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1775147929 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59707370882 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636094674556 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2909397588 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268288126439 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911460558208 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595978548702 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143201228582 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558677058757 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.