the line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000
The line graph illustrates the quantity of fast-food consumed by teenagers in Australia, over 15 years, from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the consumption of pizza and hamburgers went up, whereas the amount of fish and chips eaten diminished over the 15-year timescale.
In 1975, the figures for pizza and hamburgers were low, which were at 5 times per year. Over the following years, they all took a nosedive. The number of hamburgers dramatically surged, which was exceeded the amount of fish and chips in 1985 and hit the highest point at 100 times on average in 2000. Similar to the hamburgers, there was also an enormous increase in the quantity of Pizza. It overtook the fish and chips in the 1990s then reached a peak at over 80 times per year in 1985 which remained stable from 1985 to 2000.
In sharp contrast to it, the amount of fish and chips which was at 100 times per year in 1975 decreased significantly after the increasing trend in 1985. In 2000, it reached the lowest point-just over 40 times, which was twice and a half less likely than its figure in 1975.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-30 | baoquyen1906 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | beobuic1 | view | |
| 2023-01-16 | beobuic1 | view | |
| 2022-08-07 | Taiwo Morounfolu | view | |
| 2022-08-07 | Taiwo Morounfolu | view |
- the line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 73
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in million tones from four different sectors between 1990 to 2007 73
- The line chart below shows the percentage of Internet users in 3 countries from 1999 to 2009 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Over the following years, they all took a nosedive. The number of hamburgers dramatically ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61025641026 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47636560059 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4870868533 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173109574289 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832857280085 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125539348669 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153900001935 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161399630179 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.