The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.
The second chart shows their destinations over the same period
The chart illustrated a questionnaire of 100000 visitors abroad for the purpose of travels of UK inhabitants during 5 years. The second bar chart compared how many visitors traveled to 3 different countries during the identical time. Overall, most of the people who travelers intended to holiday had been raising whole period, moreover, commuters to abroad were increasing year by year except in 1995 while the huge amount of passengers passed to Western Europe.
About table, initially, in 1994, totally 22072 UK passengers visited abroad especially more than half of them was vacationer (15246). Nevertheless, bit amount of passengers decreased in 1995 (entirely 21610) except for business purposes. Furthermore, travelers abroad had been raising until the end of the period reached 28828 and guests who had purposes of the holiday were still a high amount.
By bar chart, 18000 travelers passed to Western Europe while a tiny amount of commuters passed to North America and other areas (about 1000 and 2000 respectively) in 1994. However, passengers who went to Western Europe had dwindled nearly by 1000 and there was no change in the other two areas in next year. Additionally, passengers had been growing almost by 6000 to Western Europe and each rose by 1000 to North America and other areas at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-12 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | anhminhbnvn1 | view | |
| 2023-04-12 | anhminhbnvn1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | mnaufaln | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | mnaufaln | 89 | view |
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 61
- Percentage of UK people who consumed the daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of passengers passed to Western Europe About table initially in 1994 totally 22...
^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the holiday were still a high amount By bar chart 18000 travelers passed to W...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99539170507 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58753195633 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520737327189 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 217.0 22.4926829268 965% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1084.0 112.824112599 961% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 217.0 22.9334400587 946% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 82.0 5.23603664747 1566% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152015043133 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152015043133 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111612223676 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530424296784 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 110.6 13.2329268293 836% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -140.32 61.2550243902 -229% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 86.7 10.3012195122 842% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.2 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.38 8.06136585366 216% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 88.8 10.9970731707 807% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.