The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
The best way for a society to prepare its young citizens for leadership in any field is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation rather than competition.
We can take an example case to discuss why sense of cooperation is best way compared to competition for preparing young citizens for leadership in any field. Any country can be taken as an example. The country can develop well and progress if there is harmony among the people of the country. Then in the above case every citizen of the country can strive for the country's overall development along with the leader of the country who represents their nation. If there is no unity among the people of the country, then even a best leader cannot develop the country. If there are disparities among the people, then the leader will face difficulties in solving the problems of his nation. A leader can be considered best when can bring unity among the people of his nation which helps him in developing their nation.
Healthy competition can be done when the people who compete for leadership in any field cooperate among themselves and collectively work together to address the problems in their field. Each one can help others in addressing the problems and therefore strive for the betterment of the society.
When there is unity among the people, then anything can be achieved easily as there will be equal amount of effort from each one and the effort will be more when compared to the case of competition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in o 60
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 50
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom Do you agree or disagree 73
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...ase to discuss why sense of cooperation is best way compared to competition for prepari...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ong the people of the country then even a best leader cannot develop the country ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 255.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52712771172 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 215.323595506 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41568627451 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 255.0 23.0359550562 1107% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1210.0 118.986275619 1017% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 255.0 23.4991977007 1085% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 36.0 5.21951772744 690% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331549726103 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.331549726103 0.0831039109588 399% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286068057016 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.241321296531 0.0667264976115 362% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 128.4 14.1392134831 908% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -178.89 48.8420337079 -366% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 101.6 12.1743820225 835% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.75 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.64 8.38706741573 222% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 38.0 100.480337079 38% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.8971910112 471% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 104.0 11.2143820225 927% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.7820224719 475% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.