In Some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In recent years, the living alone has become prevalent among people especially who are living in metropolitan areas and this rate is far higher in developed countries. I believe this trend has more negative consequences than the few positive outcomes it offers.
To begin with, it is argued that living lonely has a lot of benefits for people and their society. In terms of personality, the initial reason why single occupants tend to live alone is that they can become a more independent person in their life. To illustrate, children who have to leave their parents to continue their studies in foreign countries, people are more independent than their peers because they have to do several things at the same time without getting help from their relatives. Moreover, single people are likely to attend more public social affairs. In fact, this type of people has a lot of time to participate in social activities and become a volunteer to help people who are living in deprived areas.
From another angle, the trend of increasing single-person family has many drawbacks. Firstly, the growing willingness to live alone has a direct relationship with the percentage of people suffers from psychological problems such as isolation and depression. The statistics show that the number of depressed people has increased all over these days, unlike the traditional family where there is always a warm atmosphere to share someone’s distress. Secondly, people in order to overcome their isolation choose a negative lifestyle. Accosting to a study, alone individuals often prefer to consume drugs. Therefore, not only could not they reduce their mental disorders, but also they become addicted to drugs gradually.
From what has been discussed, although living alone can improve people’s personality and e positive impact on their society, in my opinion, this trend will increase mental disease and they become addicted to harmful materials to reduce their problems.
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 56
- In Some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than the few positive outcomes it offers To begin with it is argued that living l...
^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ithout getting help from their relatives Moreover single people are likely to att...
^^
Line 2, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people who are living in deprived areas From another angle the trend of increasi...
^^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they become addicted to drugs gradually From what has been discussed although li...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14012738854 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62120290972 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554140127389 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 314.0 20.2975951904 1547% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1614.0 106.682146367 1513% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 314.0 20.7667163134 1512% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 120.0 7.06120827912 1699% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278189396041 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.278189396041 0.084324248473 330% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186198216691 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858419286389 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 159.8 13.0946893788 1220% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -255.69 50.2224549098 -509% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 126.9 11.3001002004 1123% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.01 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.08 8.58950901804 269% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 127.6 10.1190380762 1261% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 127.0 10.7795591182 1178% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.