The table below gives information the satisfaction rate in a course of first-year students.
The given table graph provides figures for the first-year students’ satisfaction scale in three different courses in a university.
Overall, it is clear that there were varied popularities among students and commerce course was dominant and highly rated in all resources offered by the university. Additionally, the proportion of students giving gratification for the pre-course information and other resources of economics was minor.
95% of commerce students satisfied with pre-course information and teaching quality, while other resources accounted for only 81%. While the proportions of economics students pleasured with teaching and tutor accounted for 95% and 92%, respectively, the proportions of those in pre-course information and other sources were around only 60%.
The proportion of law students satisfied with other resources was 80%, followed by the tutor which made up 76%. The percentages of students gratified with pre-course information and print resource were almost the same, with approximate 70%. In contrast, only 62% of students gave satisfaction for the teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | hanthecutie | view | |
| 2023-06-13 | Hayoni Candy | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | minh phương phạm hồng | 100 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | minh phương phạm hồng | view | |
| 2023-01-17 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
- The table shows the number pf employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 84
- The graph below shows the number of applicants from four different countries in a UK university between 1999 and 2003 74
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produces 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquires received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 73
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produces 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8375 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11608729018 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7359245282 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312459492283 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150996851 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794253593421 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211004729897 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761198608209 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.